The rise of Artificial Intelligence, especially Generative AI, has triggered a familiar debate in boardrooms and capital markets:
The rise of Artificial Intelligence, especially Generative AI, has triggered a familiar debate in boardrooms and capital markets:
👉 Is AI the foundation of the next productivity revolution? 👉 Or is it another overhyped bubble waiting to burst?
Depending on whom you ask, AI is either the engine of long-term economic growth or the most overrated technology of our time. This debate matters — because it directly influences capital allocation, hiring, strategy, and competitive positioning.
So the real question is not whether AI is a bubble — but what kind of bubble it might be.
History gives us two useful comparisons:
A speculative frenzy with no real underlying value. Prices disconnected entirely from reality — and collapsed completely.
A genuine technological breakthrough mixed with excessive optimism. Many companies failed, valuations crashed — yet the internet went on to reshape the global economy.
So where does AI fall?
The evidence increasingly suggests:
AI looks far more like the early internet than tulip mania.
Multiple studies and real-world examples show that AI is not just theoretical:
~75% of enterprises report productivity or decision-making improvements from generative AI
Consultants using AI tools are delivering significantly better outputs
Banks are improving sales productivity and advisor efficiency
Accounting and finance teams are automating manual workflows with very high ROI
This tells us something important:
AI is already useful today.
That alone rules out tulip-style speculation.
At the same time, more rigorous research shows a sobering reality:
Only ~5% of firms have achieved clear, measurable P&L-level gains from AI
Why the gap?
Because experimentation is easy — transformation is hard.
Most organizations struggle with:
Redesigning workflows
Data readiness and governance
Ownership and accountability
Embedding AI into core operating models
In other words, AI works — but scaling it profitably requires deep organizational change.
That’s the hardest question.
Current valuations assume massive future productivity gains. But small changes in assumptions — timing, risk, adoption speed — can dramatically alter valuations.
So AI could be:
Overvalued
Fairly valued
Or even undervalued
No one knows with certainty.
What is clear: markets are betting on long-term transformation, while most companies are still in early integration stages.
The critical question is not:
❌ “Will AI create value?”
✅ “How fast will my company and industry convert AI into real financial results?”
History teaches us that technology does not fail — organizations fail to adapt.
If you want to be among the winners, focus on these priorities:
AI is not about bolting tools onto old processes. It’s about rethinking how work, roles, and even industries should function in an AI-first world.
Efficiency matters — but growth creates outsized value. The biggest returns will come from better customer experiences, not just cheaper ones.
The pace of change is accelerating. Waiting feels safe — but catching up later will be far harder and far more expensive.
AI is not a fake bubble.
It is a real technological shift unfolding faster than most organizations can absorb. Just like the internet era, many companies will fail — not because AI was wrong, but because leadership moved too slowly.
The smartest investment today may not be in stocks —
but in time, learning, and organizational redesign.
Recent Opinions :
No Opinion yet. Be the first one!